From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 20.04.2012 07:46, schrieb Daniel Krügler:   
   > Therefore in regard to expression analysis we can say the following   
   > about the sub-expression 'b':   
   >   
   > a) It is an lvalue.   
   >   
   > b) It has type dummy const.   
   >   
   > The const-qualifier is conserved here, because dummy is a class type   
   > (According to [basic.lval] p4 this does not apply to non-class   
   > types, even though it does apply for array types as well).   
      
   The last part within the parenthesis may cause confusion, because it   
   does not really fit here in this discussion: Only prvalues of   
   non-class, non-array types are not cv-qualified. But since we are   
   speaking about an lvalue of dummy, this special rule is not relevant   
   in this context.   
      
   Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)