Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,316 of 33,346    |
|    Ike Naar to Joshua Maurice    |
|    Re: postfix operator++    |
|    18 May 12 23:46:30    |
   
   05ffc68e   
   From: ike@iceland.freeshell.org   
      
   On 2012-05-19, Joshua Maurice wrote:   
   > The general rule is that you do not have a guarantee as to the order   
   > of evaluation of arguments. This is also true for most   
   > operators. (The built-in operators || and && are an   
   > exception. Google "short circuiting operators". The comma operator   
   > too. I forget if that's it.)   
      
   The ?: operator too; in   
      
    X ? Y : Z   
      
   X is evaluated before Y or Z .   
      
      
   --   
    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca