From: mordor.nospam@fly.srk.fer.hr   
      
   On 2012-07-07, Edek Pienkowski  wrote:   
   > Dnia Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:27:26 -0700, Tobias Müller napisal:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> If "pure C++" is the name of a series of articles in C++, then why   
   >> shouldn't it be allowed to present/discuss C++/CLI in one of those   
   >> articles? I mean this is comp.lang.c++.moderated and we're doing the   
   >> same.   
   >   
   > "Pure C++" suggests that there is another C++, non-pure. Which is   
      
   In this context, I understand the word "pure" being used as an   
   attribute of the series of articles, and NOT as an attribute of   
   the proper name C++.   
      
   If I saw a *single* article named "Pure C++", I'd expect it to   
   describe differences between ISO C++ and various extensions.   
      
   Now that I know that "Pure C++" is a *series* of articles (I haven't   
   read it), I'd expect the series to be ONLY about C++, i.e., I wouldn't   
   expect an article about, say, Visual Basic.   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)