From: kaba@nowhere.com   
      
   23.7.2012 11:07, Daniel Krügler wrote:   
   > Your questions refer to C++03 and C++11, so in this case I guess that   
   > no-one had enough interest in proposing another time the same thing   
   > possibly providing this time more arguments why the cost of changing the   
   > specification and each and every implementation would be justified by   
   > the obvious advantages.   
   >   
   > Nevertheless, the C++ standard is no fixed document and if you have   
   > enough interest for this feature request it is a good time to write up a   
   > proposal and to follow the standardization process carefully. It would   
   > presumably be helpful, if you or you ISO representative would be present   
   > at such a meeting, unless your proposal is so convincing that it becomes   
   > immediately accepted ;-)   
      
   Thanks for providing background. So, hypothetically, if I lived in   
   Finland, who would be my ISO representative?   
      
   --   
   http://kaba.hilvi.org   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)