From: daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com   
      
   Am 04.03.2013 23:14, schrieb Frank Birbacher:   
   > Is there a defined order of destruction for the elements of std   
   > containers, such as a vector?   
   >   
   > I have a problem where I'd like the "reverse" order for destruction,   
   > that is from back() to front(). That would correspond to the usual   
   > "reverse order of construction" as is known with class members.   
      
   C++03 did not specify the order of the destruction of the elements of   
   containers. As an (unintended) side-effect of wording changes during   
   C++11 development, the wording can now be interpreted to require reverse   
   destruction order, see   
      
   http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#2160   
      
   for some more details.   
      
   It needs to be decided whether the current state is intended or whether   
   it would be better to keep the order unspecified as before.   
      
   HTH & Greetings from Bremen,   
      
   Daniel Krügler   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)