home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 32,923 of 33,346   
   cbhattac@googlemail.com to All   
   Re: Two phase lookup issue   
   12 Mar 13 22:34:23   
   
   > My understanding is that [temp.dep] p3 is the dominating reason for   
   > this:   
   >   
   > "In the definition of a class or class template, if a base class   
   > depends on a template-parameter, the base class scope is not examined   
   > during unqualified name lookup either at the point of definition of   
   > the class template or member or during an instantiation of the class   
   > template or member."   
   >   
      
   Thanks a lot Daniel.   
      
   I looked at that location in the standard document. Though the wordings mention   
   both point of definition and point of instantiation, the examples only deal   
   with   
   point of definition cases. This makes it hard to understand the reasoning   
   behind such behaviour during point on instantiation :-(   
      
   Regards,   
   Chandranath   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca