Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,923 of 33,346    |
|    cbhattac@googlemail.com to All    |
|    Re: Two phase lookup issue    |
|    12 Mar 13 22:34:23    |
      > My understanding is that [temp.dep] p3 is the dominating reason for       > this:       >       > "In the definition of a class or class template, if a base class       > depends on a template-parameter, the base class scope is not examined       > during unqualified name lookup either at the point of definition of       > the class template or member or during an instantiation of the class       > template or member."       >              Thanks a lot Daniel.              I looked at that location in the standard document. Though the wordings mention       both point of definition and point of instantiation, the examples only deal       with       point of definition cases. This makes it hard to understand the reasoning       behind such behaviour during point on instantiation :-(              Regards,       Chandranath                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca