Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,964 of 33,346    |
|    Dave Harris to James K. Lowden    |
|    Re: Sequence container capacity after ca    |
|    01 Apr 13 13:06:34    |
      From: brangdonj@googlemail.com              In article <20130329101530.c82af800.jklowden@speakeasy.net>,       jklowden@speakeasy.net (James K. Lowden) wrote:       > Time in incompressible and money is fungible. You can spend your       > time on efficiency gains or functionality, seldom both at once.       > You're asserting that the loss in productivity is economically       > justified. All I'm asking is for you to describe that environment,       > if you would, because I've never heard of anything like it, except       > in the embedded space.              Nowadays efficiency can also be important for cloud-based computing,       where you pay for the cycles you use, and for mobile devices, where       it affects battery life.              I don't know much about either, myself. I gather some people have big       problems, which they solve by renting compute servers from the likes       of Amazon. Some of these systems are huge. Think about the processing       that Amazon themselves must do, for example. Or think about running an       online game with half a million users.              -- Dave Harris, Nottingham, UK.                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca