Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 32,970 of 33,346    |
|    David Lowndes to All    |
|    Re: Sequence container capacity after ca    |
|    03 Apr 13 03:05:45    |
      From: DavidL@example.invalid              >Better algorithms.              OK, fair enough, newer heap allocators may be faster than old basic       ones, but they're still not trivial operations, and presumably will       still have to employ locking strategies for multi-threaded       environments?              i.e. In some situations they may be quite a lot better than less       optimal old implementations used to be - but you should always       consider them as having a notable performance impact?              Dave                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca