Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 33,032 of 33,346    |
|    nvangogh to All    |
|    Why are in class initializers not allowe    |
|    13 May 13 14:55:01    |
      From: nvangogh@invalid.net              In the C++ Standard - before C++11 - any attempt to initialize a       variable inside the body of a class would fail at compilation. I am       sure that there is / was a very good reason for this, but can't       understand why it is so.              I thought that maybe it was a restriction that was imposed due to some       form of resource limitation. I am sure that I am wrong.              Now C++11 allows in class initializers. This appears to make the class       design clearer - or at least much easier to implement for a novice       like me as there is no need for a lengthy & possibly erroneous       constructor initializer list.              So out of curiosity - why were (are) in class initializers prohibited       in old c++?                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca