Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 33,055 of 33,346    |
|    Greg Marr to Andy Champ    |
|    Re: Vector sizes and other missed optimi    |
|    17 May 13 15:34:21    |
   
   From: gregmmarr@googlemail.com   
      
   On Friday, May 17, 2013 10:29:26 AM UTC-4, Andy Champ wrote:   
   >> > or for iterators:   
   > >   
   > > for(iterator it=v.begin(), end=v.end(); it!=end; ++it)   
   >   
   > .... and always feel ever-so-slightly uncomfortable that you can't do   
   > less-than on iterators.   
      
   You can, as long as they're random-access iterators.   
      
   If you're uncomfortable with that, maybe you'd be better off using   
      
   for(auto const &elem : v) {}   
      
   or   
      
   for_each(v.begin(), v.end(), [](auto const &elem){});   
      
      
   --   
    [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
    [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca