Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c++.moderated    |    Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery    |    33,346 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 33,146 of 33,346    |
|    red floyd to Mathias Gaunard    |
|    Re: Fixed for loop    |
|    24 Jul 13 23:54:25    |
      From: no.spam.here@its.invalid              On 7/19/2013 1:11 AM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:       > On Friday, June 28, 2013 3:57:42 PM UTC+2, Gon Solo wrote:       >> Is there a better way in C++ to make a very simple for loop look very       >> simple?       >>       >> #define FOR(i, x) for(int i = 0; i < x; ++i)       >       > Your may want your macro to ensure x is only evaluated once.       >       > A possible solution could be       >       > for(bool _once = true; _once; )       > for(__typeof__(x) _x_val = x; _once; _once = false)       > for(int i = 0; i < _x_val; ++i)       >       >              This code is, of course, either 1) compiler specific, or       2) ill formed.              __typeof__() is reserved to the compiler. This means that       it's either a compiler specific extension, or it's defined       by the user, in which case it's ill-formed code.                     --        [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]        [ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca