home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 33,157 of 33,346   
   Ian Collins to woodbrian77@googlemail.com   
   Re: byte buffer implementation   
   03 Aug 13 10:44:14   
   
   From: ian-news@this.is.invalid   
      
   woodbrian77@googlemail.com wrote:   
   > On Friday, August 2, 2013 12:06:10 AM UTC-5, Richard wrote:   
   >>   
   >> I use std::vector for byte buffers all the time.  I   
   >> use unsigned char instead of char because I want bytes to be 0...255   
   >> instead of -127...128.   
   >>   
   >   
   > I'm using vector at the moment.  Previously I used   
   >  also.  I don't know of any problem with using   
   >  so far.   
      
   Plain char is better choice if you are working with C interfaces that   
   use char* parameter types, unless you like wring lots of casts!  I've   
   never found a case where the signed or unsigned nature of chat has cased   
   problems.   
      
   --   
   Ian Collins   
      
      
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca