From: sgesemann@googlemail.invalid   
      
   Am 12.08.2013 09:18, schrieb Greg Marr:   
   > On Sunday, August 11, 2013 6:10:02 PM UTC-4, Daniel Krügler wrote:   
   >>> At least in VS2010 and 2012, unique_ptr::reset checks for setting   
   >>> the same pointer and ignores it.   
   >>   
   >> This is indeed a non-conforming C++11 implementation, because   
   >> those effects were intentionally changed as of   
   >   
   > I guess the libstdc++ implementation is non-conforming too.   
   >   
   >       void   
   >       reset(pointer __p = pointer()) noexcept   
   >       {   
   > 	using std::swap;   
   > 	swap(std::get<0>(_M_t), __p);   
   > 	if (__p != pointer())   
   > 	  get_deleter()(__p);   
   >       }   
      
   Actually, this looks good to me. It does not support self-reset but it   
   does not have to according to the standard. What do you think is   
   non-conforming about it?   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)