home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 33,218 of 33,346   
   Daryle Walker to All   
   Re: Is "T[N][]" (or "T[N][][M]") indirec   
   29 Sep 13 19:17:27   
   
   From: darylew@googlemail.com   
      
   On Sunday, September 22, 2013 8:30:03 PM UTC-4, Daniel Krügler wrote:   
      
   > I do not understand what you mean by direct or indirect means in this   
   > contact. The standard clearly says that such types are not allowed, it   
   > doesn't distinguish direct or indirect ways to form them.   
      
   Where the Standard talks about adjacent array specifications, there are two   
   possible meanings:   
      
   1. The specifications are lexically adjacent: "using Z = int[][N]"   
   2. The specifications are logically adjacent: "using X = int[]; using Y = X[M]"   
      
   I wasn't sure of which meaning.  But you state that "adjacent" is logical; that   
   making an array of an array of unknown bound indirectly via composing type   
   aliases isn't allowed.   
      
   I found a C++14 draft, and it solves the problem unambiguously.  It explicitly   
   states that an array of unknown bound cannot be used as an array element type.   
      
   Daryle W.   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca