home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c++.moderated      Moderated discussion of C++ superhackery      33,346 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 33,250 of 33,346   
   Martin Bonner to Robert Simpson   
   Re: Dereferencing pointer as argument to   
   30 Oct 13 09:29:55   
   
   From: martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk   
      
   On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 12:00:02 AM UTC, Robert Simpson wrote:   
   > My question is, if I have a function taking an argument by reference,   
   > is it bad practice to call that function with a dereferenced pointer?   
      
   No, provided you know (possibly because you have already checked) that   
   the pointer is not null.   
      
      
   > void myfunc( Widget& w );   
   > std::unique_ptr< Widget > mywidget;   
      
     mywidget = new Widget; // Need to set mywidget.   
      
   > myfunc( *mywidget.get() );   
      
   > I have written this in my code, but I believe that   
   > there is probably a better solution.   
      
   "Better" in what sense?   
      
   If your pointer *can* be null, then you can't dereference   
   it to pass it to the function.  You need a genuine object   
   to bind the reference to.   
      
      
   --   
         [ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]   
         [ comp.lang.c++.moderated.    First time posters: Do this! ]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca