Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,299 of 117,927    |
|    Paul Rubin to albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl    |
|    Re: Closures    |
|    11 Mar 24 20:13:24    |
      From: no.email@nospam.invalid              albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes:       > Jenkin's device, call-by-name parameters. That was an obscure feature       > got in algol60 their by accident.              I think you mean               https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jensen's_device              which I was unfamiliar with. But I thought call-by-name was not at all       accidental.              > That was a form of closure?              I would say that it is, but in Algol-60 I guess it can be stack       allocated, unlike Scheme closures which have to be on the heap. You       could imagine an Algol-60 extension that allowed passing procedures as       values. That in turn might require heap allocating closures.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca