home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.forth      Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst      117,927 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 116,315 of 117,927   
   Paul Rubin to albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl   
   Re: Confusion about pointers in c/cc   
   14 Mar 24 15:04:31   
   
   From: no.email@nospam.invalid   
      
   albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes:   
   > All non-toy languages have side-effects. All i/o are side effects.   
   > It is impossible to do that with addresses (ports or memory) that have   
   > connection to the real world, like actuators that close valves.   
   > Relying on an OS only serves to hide this.   
      
   I don't see what you're getting at here.  It's far preferable to isolate   
   the unsafe operations to a few places in the program, than to have them   
   pervading the code base.  E.g. you can't really write a garbage   
   collector without dealing with memory addresses, but if the GC is part   
   of a Lisp interpreter, the user's Lisp program doesn't have to be able   
   to see the raw addresses.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca