Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,315 of 117,927    |
|    Paul Rubin to albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl    |
|    Re: Confusion about pointers in c/cc    |
|    14 Mar 24 15:04:31    |
      From: no.email@nospam.invalid              albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes:       > All non-toy languages have side-effects. All i/o are side effects.       > It is impossible to do that with addresses (ports or memory) that have       > connection to the real world, like actuators that close valves.       > Relying on an OS only serves to hide this.              I don't see what you're getting at here. It's far preferable to isolate       the unsafe operations to a few places in the program, than to have them       pervading the code base. E.g. you can't really write a garbage       collector without dealing with memory addresses, but if the GC is part       of a Lisp interpreter, the user's Lisp program doesn't have to be able       to see the raw addresses.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca