Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,403 of 117,927    |
|    Krishna Myneni to Anton Ertl    |
|    Re: Floating point implementations on AM    |
|    13 Apr 24 18:47:20    |
      From: krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org              On 4/13/24 12:55, Anton Ertl wrote:       > I just looked at the floating-point implementations of recent       > SwiftForth and VFX (finally present in the system from the start), and       > on iForth-5.1-mini (for comparison):       >       > 1 FLOATS .       >       > reports:       >       > 16 iforth       > 10 sf64       > 10 vfx64       >       > For       >       > : foo f+ f* ;       >       > the resulting code is:       >       > SwiftForth x64-Linux 4.0.0-RC87 24-Mar-2024       > : foo f+ f* ; ok       > see foo       > 44E8B9 ST(0) ST(1) FADDP DEC1       > 44E8BB ST(0) ST(1) FMULP DEC9       > 44E8BD RET C3 ok       >       >       > VFX Forth 64 5.43 [build 0199] 2023-11-09 for Linux x64       > © MicroProcessor Engineering Ltd, 1998-2023       >       > : foo f+ f* ; ok       > see foo       > FOO       > ( 0050A250 DEC1 ) FADDP ST(1), ST       > ( 0050A252 DEC9 ) FMULP ST(1), ST       > ( 0050A254 C3 ) RET/NEXT       > ( 5 bytes, 3 instructions )       >       >       > iForth:       > $10226000 : foo 488BC04883ED088F4500 H.@H.m..E.       > $1022600A fld [r13 0 +] tbyte41DB6D00 A[m.       > $1022600E fld [r13 #16 +] tbyte       > 41DB6D10 A[m.       > $10226012 fxch ST(2) D9CA YJ       > $10226014 lea r13, [r13 #32 +] qword       > 4D8D6D20 M.m       > $10226018 faddp ST(1), ST DEC1 ^A       > $1022601A fxch ST(1) D9C9 YI       > $1022601C fpopswap, 41DB6D00D9CA4D8D6D10 A[m.YJM.m.       > $10226026 fmulp ST(1), ST DEC9 ^I       > $10226028 fpush, 4D8D6DF0D9C941DB7D00 M.mpYIA[}.       > $10226032 ; 488B45004883C508FFE0 H.E.H.E..`       ok       >       > So apparently the 8 hardware FP stack items are enough for SwiftForth       > and VFX, while iForth prefers to use an FP stack in memory to allow       > for a deeper FP stack.       >       ...              For me, an 8 item hardware fp stack limit is too limiting to be useful.       This is mostly because of my use of the fp stack for initializing tables       (arrays and matrices), and my coding style of returning more than 8       floats on the fp stack for some types of computation. No doubt one can       limit themselves to an 8-item fp stack, but I'd hate to have to code wit       such a limit.              --       Krishna              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca