Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| comp.lang.forth | Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst | 117,927 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 116,513 of 117,927 |
| Ruvim to dxf |
| Re: Stack notation |
| 31 May 24 14:47:18 |
From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com On 2024-05-31 11:52, dxf wrote: > On 31/05/2024 2:12 am, Ruvim wrote: >> On 2024-05-30 18:26, minforth wrote: >>> TEMP-CONVERSION ( F: celsius -- F: fahrenheit ) >>> should be clear enough, right? >> >> Right, while you have not introduced subtypes of i*r. >> >> So in the standard stack notation it would be: >> >> TEMP-CONVERSION ( F: r.celsius -- r.fahrenheit ) > > Unnecessarily complicated. > The Forth standard uses namely this notation. Stack diagrams are part of the program (or library) documentation. And what notations are used for documentation is up to authors. My initial question was about the standard stack notation. -- Ruvim --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05 * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2) |
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca