In article <2024Jun4.181145@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,   
   Anton Ertl  wrote:   
   >albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes:   
   >>For Forth we've seen: .f .F .frt .FRT .fth .4th .fs   
   >>Are there more?   
   >>   
   >>I'd like to see an official extension.   
   >   
   >At the 2015 Forth200x meeting we decided on ".4th", and that has been   
   >added to the extensions that VFX knows about   
   ><2016Mar29.122333@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>.  And indeed:   
   >   
   I wasn't aware of that this decision. Are there any influentual   
   people (GNU;s, professors) that could promote this extension with   
   distribution, in particular make ?   
      
      
   >Including foo.4th   
   >hi   
   >   
   >bye   
   >>gforth also uses .fs for non forth files,   
   >   
   >Examples?   
   >   
   >>scripts   
   >   
   >Sure, why not.   
      
   This reaction puzzles me.   
   Is it possible that .fs are actually forth source files, that   
   can only be interpreted by gforth? Why then change the extension?   
      
   (A proper script file has extension .sh and start with e.g.   
    #!/usr/bin/lina )   
      
   >- anton   
      
   Groetjes Albert   
   --   
   Don't praise the day before the evening. One swallow doesn't make spring.   
   You must not say "hey" before you have crossed the bridge. Don't sell the   
   hide of the bear until you shot it. Better one bird in the hand than ten in   
   the air. First gain is a cat purring.            - the Wise from Antrim -   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)