Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,567 of 117,927    |
|    Ruvim to Anton Ertl    |
|    Re: Forth systems with address units >8     |
|    24 Jun 24 15:25:35    |
      From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com              On 2024-06-22 10:44, Anton Ertl wrote:       > In the discussion of the special memory access words proposal the       > question has come up whether the proposal should make extra effort to       > support Forth systems with address units >8 bits.                     A question to all.              In your application code, if you want to read exactly one byte at an       address, do you prefer to use the word "c@" or "b@"?                     I prefer to use "b@" in such a case, even if in the Forth system these       words are equal.                            --       Ruvim              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca