Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
| comp.lang.forth | Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst | 117,927 messages |
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
| Message 116,574 of 117,927 |
| Krishna Myneni to Anton Ertl |
| Re: 0 SET-ORDER why? |
| 26 Jun 24 05:56:51 |
From: krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org
On 6/26/24 02:49, Anton Ertl wrote:
> Krishna Myneni writes:
>> Why is 0 a valid argument to SET-ORDER (from the optional Search-Order
>> word set)? It can leave a Forth system in a non-recoverable state.
>
> So what? There are lots of ways to put a Forth system in a
> non-recoverable state.
> ...
By design? No.
--
Krishna
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca
