From: krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org   
      
   On 6/30/24 11:10, Krishna Myneni wrote:   
   > On 6/29/24 21:21, dxf wrote:   
   ...   
   >> Under what circumstances is 0 SET-ORDER executed inadvertently?   
   >>   
   >   
   > One example: assume you have a value containing the number of wordlists   
   >   
   > 0 value Nwid   
   >   
   > and it is not properly set. Then doing,   
   >   
   > wid1 wid2 ... widn Nwid SET-ORDER   
   >   
      
   Beyond any particular case in which 0 SET-ORDER might occur, I am more   
   concerned with the fact that the standard does not guarantee a minimum   
   search order, from which it is useful to recover the search order   
   including it and the Forth word list. At the core, this is really the   
   problem.   
      
   --   
   Krishna   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)