Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,622 of 117,927    |
|    sjack to All    |
|    Buffer Allocation    |
|    13 Jul 24 20:59:33    |
      From: sjack@dontemail.me              I replace my MALLOC with a simpler buffer allocation placed in a       vocabulary named BUF :        BUF ALLOCATE FORTH 2@ VALUE FOO_SIZE VALUE FOO_BUFFER              The only other words in BUF are LIST and -BUF .       LIST displays the chain of allocated buffers.       -BUF Used by NIX to free buffers which links are no longer        in the dictionary. (No FREE defined; NIX uses BRK to        reduce data end.)              MALLOC works ok; just more than I need. I'm wanting to       operate more in a mode of run job then empty. Only have       two or three buffers normally and if a job needs a buffer       its allocated and freed up at end of job via -BUF . So       having a free buffer list to check on allocation is not needed       nor is needed a procedure to recombine buffers on release.              The kind of one-shot things that run then empty are jobs,       utilities, demos and tests. The two or three more permanent       buffers are toad string ring buffers.              --       me              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca