Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,951 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,707 of 117,951    |
|    Gerry Jackson to Ruvim    |
|    Re: Using include-file    |
|    04 Sep 24 10:54:48    |
      From: do-not-use@swldwa.uk              On 02/09/2024 21:11, Ruvim wrote:       > Do you know practical cases of using "include-file" in programs?       >       > I can't imagine how this word could be used in standard programs.       >       > Only one idea: to skip BOM (byte-order mark) before include the file       > contents.       >       > Using other system-specific means, this word can probably be used to       > organize inter-process communication: when a file descriptor (e.g. a       > pipe) is passed from one process to another and used as the input       > source. But why do you need to load Forth code this way?       >              I've used it to redefine INCLUDED              : included ( ... caddr u -- ... )        r/o open-path-file throw include-file                     where OPEN-PATH-FILE takes a string specifying a list of alternative       relative paths to Forth source files which it tries in turn to open. It       does this by creating an absolute directory path and calls OPEN-FILE. If       an open succeeds it returns the file-id to be included by INCLUDE-FILE.       If no relative path succeeds an exception is thrown.              I've used it to test a program on several different Forth systems, each       of which has its own way of handling relative directory paths but they       all work with an absolute path.              --       Gerry              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca