From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com   
      
   Do you think that the Forth standard should recognize the classic   
   single-xt approach as possible for implementing a standard Forth system?   
      
   The classic single-xt approach implies that only one execution token   
   (xt) is associated with a name token (nt), and only one name token is   
   associated with a word (a named Forth definition). And words whose   
   compilation semantics differ form default compilation semantics are   
   implemented as immediate words.   
      
      
   --   
   Ruvim   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)