Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,766 of 117,927    |
|    dxf to Ruvim    |
|    Re: Standardization process    |
|    18 Sep 24 23:39:45    |
      From: dxforth@gmail.com              On 18/09/2024 8:51 pm, Ruvim wrote:       > On 2024-09-18 14:16, dxf wrote:       >> On 18/09/2024 5:07 pm, Ruvim wrote:       >>> On 2024-09-18 07:39, dxf wrote:       >>> ...       >>>       >>>> Their role on the TC is to ensure       >>>> nothing jeopardizes their investment. It's impossible to have spent       >>>> 20 years 'standardizing' and have achieved so little.       >>>       >>> This critics is absolutely fruitless. No one owes you to develop any       specifications unless you pay for it. Whether some people have achieved much       or little is their own business.       >>       >> When the ANS-TC sat, they did consider it their business and priority.       >       > And what? Anybody can claim that.              Not many can back it up with a 200+ page technical document.       >> I've made that choice.       >       > It seems, despite your choice, the Forth standardization process that is       based on the forth-standard.org platform still bothers your.               Why do I talk about the Standard? It's kind of unavoidable in technical       discussions when forthers have been suckled on it.              > Then why don't you want to take part?              Perhaps because I've seen your success rate :)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca