From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com   
      
   On 2024-09-18 14:16, dxf wrote:   
   > On 18/09/2024 5:07 pm, Ruvim wrote:   
   >> On 2024-09-18 07:39, dxf wrote:   
   >> ...   
   >>   
   >>> Their role on the TC is to ensure   
   >>> nothing jeopardizes their investment.  It's impossible to have spent   
   >>> 20 years 'standardizing' and have achieved so little.   
   >>   
   >> This critics is absolutely fruitless. No one owes you to develop any   
   specifications unless you pay for it. Whether some people have achieved much   
   or little is their own business.   
   >   
   > When the ANS-TC sat, they did consider it their business and priority.   
      
   And what?  Anybody can claim that.   
      
      
   > They knew the world wasn't going to wait.  Perhaps the situation has   
   > changed and now it's only fans the TC need worry about.   
      
   > If the attitude is 'take it or leave it',   
      
   I think, you missed another option. The attitude is: take it, or make it   
   better, or leave it (and maybe build your own theme park).   
      
   I don't see on what basis can someone *demand* something from the TC.   
      
      
   > I've made that choice.   
      
   It seems, despite your choice, the Forth standardization process that is   
   based on the forth-standard.org platform still bothers your.  Then why   
   don't you want to take part?   
      
      
   --   
   Ruvim   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)