Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,878 of 117,927    |
|    Ruvim to dxf    |
|    Re: Naming conventions    |
|    13 Oct 24 11:51:17    |
      From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com              On 2024-10-13 09:27, dxf wrote:       > On 13/10/2024 3:10 pm, Ruvim wrote:       >> On 2024-10-13 06:59, dxf wrote:       >>> On 13/10/2024 1:20 pm, Ruvim wrote:       >>>> On 2024-10-13 05:13, dxf wrote:       >>>>> On 13/10/2024 12:54 am, Ruvim wrote:       >>>>>> On 2024-10-12 05:45, dxf wrote:       >>>>>>> The basics:       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> : .BAD ( -- ) cr ." Invalid item" .abort ;       >>>>>>>       >>>>>>> : ZE? ( x -- ) if .bad then ; \ abort if non-zero       >>>>>>> : NZ? ( x -- ) 0= ze? ; \ abort if zero       >>>>>>       >>>>>> Typically, if word name ends with a question mark, the first (top)       output parameter of the word is a *flag*. And it's true for all standard       words. (though, opposite is not true)       >>>>>       >>>>> It's rather similar.       >>>>>       >>>>> ZE? NZ? destructively tests TOS       >>>>       >>>> But these words do not return a flag in the first output parameter. So,       their names violate the common convention.       >>>       >>> Conventions are a guide. Thankfully they're not yet a law.       >>>       >>       >> Sure. But the mentioned conventions seem good.       >>       >> If you are proposing generally useful words, and their names violate a       common convention, you could probably explain why it is not worth following       that convention in this case (or in general).       >       > Convention means doing something in a consistent way unless there's a reason       to do       > otherwise.              And what is your reason?                     > The standard had no qualms defining the word ? which leaves no flag.              The word `?` in the standard can be explained by a historical accident       that occurred in ancient times. Moreover, this word is almost not used       in programs.              Your case cannot be explained by a historical accident ;)                     > I don't feel any less entitled coming up with names that are short and to       the point.              Feelings are not the best argument regarding names and conventions ;)                     --       Ruvim              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca