home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.forth      Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst      117,927 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 116,943 of 117,927   
   Anthony Howe to Ruvim   
   Re: bye with exit status   
   08 Nov 24 06:34:05   
   
   From: achowe@snert.com   
      
   On 2024-11-07 17:04, Ruvim wrote:   
   > On 2024-11-07 22:50, Anthony Howe wrote:   
   >> On 2024-11-07 06:56, Ruvim wrote:   
   >>> I would like to find a more appropriate name for this word than "bye-   
   status".   
   >>   
   >> (bye) ( u -- )   
   >>   
   >> Seems apropos, short, to the point and indicative of an internal word.   
   >   
   > Yes, and because of the latter this name cannot be used for a standard word.   
   > Standard words are not internal words, but are part of the public interface.   
      
   But the precedent for defining and exposing an internal word has been set in   
   the   
   standard with Locals `(local)`.  So defining `(bye)` seems reasonable.   
      
   > What about the following options:   
   >   
   >    badbye ( n -- never )   
   >      - because it's probably not normal termination   
   >      - if n is 0, then it's false-bad (i.e, good)   
      
   `badbye` - did you have a bad breakup as a teen?  If you're a JJ Abrams fan   
   maybe why not `badrobot`.   
      
   >    goodbye ( n -- never )   
   >      - ironically when n is not zero   
      
   Well I had suggested `bye-bye` and tossed the idea of `goodbye` cause is not so   
   good.   
      
   >    getout ( n -- never )   
   >      - send control very far from here   
      
   Sounds like something from a horror movie get-out! get out   
   of the house!   
      
   Maybe borrow from non-english:   
      
   	`ciao`  `sayonara`  `fini`   
      
   Maybe ask someone with young children and see what they come up with.  Bet you   
   get some "interesting" answers.   
      
   > SIGTERM is a good association with processes.   
   >   
   > Perhaps, SIGTERM can be send to another process too.   
      
   That would probably something like kill(2), eg: kill(1234, SIGTERM)   
      
   --   
   Anthony C Howe   
   achowe@snert.com                                   BarricadeMX & Milters   
   http://nanozen.snert.com/                          http://software.snert.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca