Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 116,943 of 117,927    |
|    Anthony Howe to Ruvim    |
|    Re: bye with exit status    |
|    08 Nov 24 06:34:05    |
      From: achowe@snert.com              On 2024-11-07 17:04, Ruvim wrote:       > On 2024-11-07 22:50, Anthony Howe wrote:       >> On 2024-11-07 06:56, Ruvim wrote:       >>> I would like to find a more appropriate name for this word than "bye-       status".       >>       >> (bye) ( u -- )       >>       >> Seems apropos, short, to the point and indicative of an internal word.       >       > Yes, and because of the latter this name cannot be used for a standard word.       > Standard words are not internal words, but are part of the public interface.              But the precedent for defining and exposing an internal word has been set in       the       standard with Locals `(local)`. So defining `(bye)` seems reasonable.              > What about the following options:       >       > badbye ( n -- never )       > - because it's probably not normal termination       > - if n is 0, then it's false-bad (i.e, good)              `badbye` - did you have a bad breakup as a teen? If you're a JJ Abrams fan       maybe why not `badrobot`.              > goodbye ( n -- never )       > - ironically when n is not zero              Well I had suggested `bye-bye` and tossed the idea of `goodbye` cause is not so       good.              > getout ( n -- never )       > - send control very far from here              Sounds like something from a horror movie |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca