Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,022 of 117,927    |
|    Ruvim to Anton Ertl    |
|    Re: PAD and preemptive multi-tasking    |
|    29 Jan 25 02:50:34    |
      From: ruvim.pinka@gmail.com              On 2024-12-20 14:10, Anton Ertl wrote:       > Bernd Paysan have been wondering what to do about PAD in the presence       > of preemptive multitasking (but not multi-user) as implemented in       > Gforth.       >       > We see two possible scenarios:       >       > If PAD is used only directly by the user for interactive work, only       > one PAD is needed.       >       > OTOH, if PAD is used as temporary storage in words that may be called       > by any task, PAD needs to be part of the per-task (aka USER) data.       [...]       > In any case, the question is how PAD is used by current programs that       > might be run on Gforth.       >                     I don't use PAD in multitasking/multithreaded applications, or even in       single-tasking applications. But only in interactive work, or for some       tests in the file loading time.              In SP-Forth/4, PAD is located in the user-area (per-task). But I don't       know examples of using it in different thread in parallel.                     --       Ruvim              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca