Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,097 of 117,927    |
|    albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl to All    |
|    On my AMD FX-8370 I don't benefit from a    |
|    27 Feb 25 13:18:57    |
      I test lina64 on my AMD FX-8370 8 core 4 Ghz.              The genuine Byte benchmark sieve takes 1.5 ms on my unmodified lina.       That is a indirect threaded Forth with no optimisation and all the       machine code scattered throughout the dictionary.              I build a version where there is actually a code segment and all code is       collected there. There was no significant difference in speed.              All the code of the Forth fits comfortable in the L1 cache.       Is this to be expected?       An L1 cache hit is an L1 cache hit?              Could Intel processors respond more to this distinction?                     Groetjes Albert       --       Temu exploits Christians: (Disclaimer, only 10 apostles)       Last Supper Acrylic Suncatcher - 15Cm Round Stained Glass- Style Wall       Art For Home, Office And Garden Decor - Perfect For Windows, Bars,       And Gifts For Friends Family And Colleagues.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca