Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,198 of 117,927    |
|    dxf to sjack    |
|    Re: "The Best Programming Language for t    |
|    12 Apr 25 00:46:00    |
   
   From: dxforth@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/04/2025 11:39 pm, sjack wrote:   
   > dxf wrote:   
   >>   
   >> With REPRESENT we're dealing with full-precision numbers being displayed   
   >> in lesser precision. Would 'significant digits plus one' even apply?   
   >>   
   > Unsure what is meant by "full-precision numbers" so the following   
   > reasoning my be off in that respect:   
   >   
   > Floating-point has _potential_ to express a number with _maximum_ of u   
   > significant digits plus one rounded digit. However, in application a   
   > result may have less than the maximum potential significant digits and   
   > should be returned (displayed) with all digits _after the first   
   > non-significant digit_ chopped (or padded with zero's).   
   >   
   > For sure I'm no authority on floating-point numbers. The only thing   
   > I know is what I recall from remedial math in the olden days of light   
   > that one wants a result of u significant digits plus the one rounded   
   > digit. Such form of number is then useful for other floating-point   
   > calculations.   
      
   I recall IEEE-754 talking about 'correctly rounded' numbers when   
   converting to external representation. This is likely to have   
   been a factor in Intel's decision to use 80-bits internally.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca