Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,281 of 117,927    |
|    Hans Bezemer to All    |
|    Re: Having fun with embedded Forth in BA    |
|    04 May 25 13:12:19    |
      From: the.beez.speaks@gmail.com              On 03-05-2025 18:01, Hans Bezemer wrote:       Okay, I'm done. I extended the vocabulary considerably, so now comments       are supported, ticking definitions, values are supported (TO, +TO),       strings, BEGIN..WHILE..UNTIL|REPEAT, IF..ELSE..THEN, EXECUTE.              Notoriously missing are (still) DO..LOOP. I also decided to "hide" the       code in REM statements, first: because those strange contraptions in the       '80-ies did the same and second, you can still execute the program as is.              Little example:              If Line(_Guesses) = 0 Then Print "Please transpile this program first       using \quBForth.bas\q." : End              Push Rnd(10)+1              Rem Forth       Rem : Guesses ( secret# #times --)       Rem ." Guess a number between 1 and 10" cr       Rem begin \ repeat n times       Rem dup \ check number of guesses       Rem while \ when ok       Rem over       Rem uBasic              Input a : Push a              Rem Forth       Rem over over = if ." Guessed!" cr abort then       Rem ." Too " > if ." small" else ." big" then cr 1 -       Rem repeat \ if guessed, exit       Rem drop ." You didn't guess it, it was " . cr       Rem ; \ error if not guessed       Rem uBasic              Proc _Guesses(3)              I'll see about this DO..LOOP ;-)              Hans Bezemer              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca