Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,345 of 117,927    |
|    dxf to All    |
|    Re: LOOP    |
|    28 Jun 25 22:41:41    |
      From: dxforth@gmail.com              FOR/NEXT DO/LOOP wars have raged ever since Moore introduced the former.       Here's a [cold] blast from the past...               Minutes of the FIGGY BAR RT Conference.               Date: 11/16/89 Time: 22:36EST               <[Wil] W.BADEN1> DO/LOOP will never be as efficient as FOR/NEXT.        <[Wil] W.BADEN1> FOR/NEXT will never be as effective as DO/LOOP.               Date: 06/28/90 Time: 22:32EDT               <[Wil] W.BADEN1> Chuck walked out of ANSI becuz it wudn't make        FOR...NEXT required.        <[Wil] W.BADEN1> That was 1988. And the operative word is "required."              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca