Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,364 of 117,927    |
|    Hans Bezemer to Waldek Hebisch    |
|    Re: Parsing timestamps?    |
|    01 Jul 25 19:34:34    |
      From: the.beez.speaks@gmail.com              On 26-06-2025 07:20, Waldek Hebisch wrote:       > Frankly, I do not see how missing language features       > can improve design.              Then what the heck are you doing with Forth? I mean:       - There are NO types, nor a compiler that holds your hand by checking       them incessantly ;       - There is NO expression parser in the sense of a shunting yard       algorithm that does all the work for you;       - There is NO calling mechanism in the sense that it transfers all the       parameters for you and neatly sets up stack frames;       - There is NO symbol table that is maintained for you - just a linked list;       - There are NO namespaces. Just some tools to hook up sub lists to one       big one.              You can rent such apartments in Tokyo center.              Hans Bezemer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca