home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.forth      Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst      117,927 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 117,448 of 117,927   
   Paul Rubin to Anton Ertl   
   Re: Parsing timestamps?   
   10 Jul 25 12:33:52   
   
   From: no.email@nospam.invalid   
      
   anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:   
   >> I believes IEEE specifies both 80 bit and 128 bit formats in addition   
   >> to 64 bit.   
   > Not 80-bit format.  binary128 and binary256 are specified.   
      
   I see, 80 bits is considered double-extended.  "The x87 and Motorola   
   68881 80-bit formats meet the requirements of the IEEE 754-1985 double   
   extended format,[12] as does the IEEE 754 128-bit binary format."   
   (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_precision)   
      
   Interestingly, Kahan's 1997 report on IEEE 754's status does say 80 bit   
   is specified.  But it sounds like that omits some nuance.   
      
   https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/IEEE754.PDF   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca