Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,502 of 117,927    |
|    dxf to Hans Bezemer    |
|    Re: READ-LINE when u1=0    |
|    27 Jul 25 11:13:53    |
      From: dxforth@gmail.com              On 26/07/2025 11:46 pm, Hans Bezemer wrote:       >       > 4tH       > 0 -> 0 1       > 10 -> 6 1       > 0 -> 0 1       > 1 -> 0 0              In my case it's ...               0 -> 0 0       10 -> 6 1        0 -> 0 0        1 -> 0 0              for two implementations and               0 -> 0 1       10 -> 6 1        0 -> 0 0        1 -> 0 0              for a third.              The reason it's a '1' is because my implementations return a ternary       that indicates EOL received, not received, or EOF.              Am I worried about the u1 = 0 result above? Not until someone can       show u1 = 0 can happen or is meaningful. I don't want to add code       for something I'll never use. Was the ternary feature useful?       I'm still in the process of evaluating that. OTOH it definitely       scratched an itch :)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca