From: minforth@gmx.net   
      
   Am 17.09.2025 um 18:53 schrieb Anton Ertl:   
    > This posting is a more general reflection about designing types in   
    > Forth; it just uses recognizers as example.   
      
   My gut feeling is that the standard Forth word zoo is already big   
   enough. Why should one define return types now, after more than half   
   a century of Forth's history? This is beyond me.   
      
   However, if it's only for a text description of those recognizers,   
   I wouldn't mind.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)