Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.forth    |    Forth programmers eat a lot of Bratwurst    |    117,927 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 117,646 of 117,927    |
|    Gerry Jackson to dxf    |
|    Re: Conditional compilation    |
|    26 Oct 25 14:10:07    |
      From: do-not-use@swldwa.uk              On 25/10/2025 12:36, dxf wrote:       > Put the following into a file and then load it:       >       > 1       >       > 0 [IF]       >       > 2       >       > 0 [IF]       >       > 3       >       > [THEN]       >       > .S       >       >       > I'm stunned at how many forths won't handle it. Caught me by surprise.              Using the implementation in the standard there are a few strange       behaviours with [if] e.g putting the above into 1 line for convenience              1 0 [if] 2 0 [if] 3 [then] \ this [then] .s \ ought to be ignored              In all Forths I tried the [then] in the comment is found by the first       [if] control starts interpreting and displays 1 so that the "ought to be       ignored" has to be commented out.              Also:              [else] can be used as a       multi-line comment [then]              --       Gerry              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca