Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 241,338 of 243,242    |
|    olcott to Tristan Wibberley    |
|    Re: My two specifications are equivalent    |
|    19 Oct 25 09:57:08    |
      XPost: comp.theory       From: polcott333@gmail.com              On 10/19/2025 4:58 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:       > On 18/10/2025 16:53, vallor wrote:       >       >> You aren't posting about C.       >>       >> And I notice you crossposted this article (which has nothing to do with       >> C) and didn't set the followup-to (as you claimed you were going to do).       >       > His reply was an honest enquiry about the proper use of comp.lang.c.       >       > How about you paste into your reply to him on comp.lang.c a copy of the       > big-8 steering board's rules for comp.lang.c. You posted nothing but a       > demand for personal satisfaction. He might not even yet know what the       > authoritative comp.lang.c rules are nor their normative location. If       > everyone demands their preference instead of telling each other the       > actual rules and where to find them and their authority then sooner or       > later the newsgroup will die because it's impossible to satisfy everyone       > perfectly ... I just looked at the contents of comp.lang.c, it looks       > like that's happened since olcott is almost the only person starting       > topics these days.       >       > If the comp.lang.c charter allows a weekly digest of the interpretation       > of a C program vs the manner of an English language specification and       > the abilities of current LLMs to report on C programs and their       > motivating specifications then it would be okay, wouldn't it?       >       > I don't use comp.lang.c much any more but if it did then a weekly digest       > of attempts to get detailed knowledge from a group topical for the       > specific C program and the terminology relating to it would seem       > appropriate to me.       >       >       > --       > Tristan Wibberley       >              Thanks for your support.              > The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except       > citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,       > of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it       > verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to       > promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation       > of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general       > superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train       > any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that       > will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.       >                     --       Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius       hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca