Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 241,342 of 243,242    |
|    Janis Papanagnou to BGB    |
|    Re: Nice way of allocating flexible stru    |
|    20 Oct 25 10:02:01    |
      From: janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com              On 15.10.2025 20:00, BGB wrote:       > On 10/15/2025 5:26 AM, bart wrote:       >> On 15/10/2025 02:13, BGB wrote:       >>       >>> There was ALGOL, but both C and Pascal descended from ALGOL.       >>       >> I've heard that before that C was somehow derived from Algol and even       >> Algol 68.       >>       >> But it is so utterly unlike either of those, that if it's from the       >> same family, then it must have been adopted.       >       > Idea is that it went ALGOL -> BCPL -> B -> C.       > Going the other way, ALGOL was derived from FORTRAN.              In which way do you think that Algol 60 was "derived from FORTRAN"?              Janis              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca