home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c      Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING      243,242 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 241,486 of 243,242   
   bart to Scott Lurndal   
   Re: New and improved version of cdecl   
   26 Oct 25 17:03:57   
   
   From: bc@freeuk.com   
      
   On 26/10/2025 16:07, Scott Lurndal wrote:   
   > bart  writes:   
   >> On 26/10/2025 11:26, bart wrote:   
   >>> On 26/10/2025 06:25, Janis Papanagnou wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> So the following are after a restart of my PC:   
   >>   
   >>   Build CDECL under WSL (files were extracted before the restart):   
   >>      60/56 seconds instead 35/49 seconds for configure/make   
   >>   
   >>   My demo above running both compiler and interpreter from source:   
   >>      0.31 seconds instead of 0.21 seconds   
   >>   
   >>   New test of gcc compiling hello.c:   
   >>      1 second, settling down to 0.23 seconds on subsequent builds   
   >   
   > Get back to us when your "build + compiler" system will successfully   
   > build all the software that currently builds with autoconf, make and  gcc.   
      
   So you are telling me it is IMPOSSIBLE to build a product with the   
   specification of CDECL, entirely in portable C? You HAVE to use all   
   those extra utilities, macro languages and what-not?   
      
   Obviously, 'all the software' that currently builds with those tools   
   will have been designed and developed *with* those tools; they will be   
   essential dependencies.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca