XPost: comp.theory, comp.lang.c++   
   From: 643-408-1753@kylheku.com   
      
   On 2025-10-27, olcott  wrote:   
   > On 10/27/2025 11:58 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >> On 2025-10-27, olcott  wrote:   
   >>> Not a single human reviewer on the planet   
   >>> will give my C snippet a fair review.   
   >>   
   >> I've gotten up to the elbow in your actual code from GitHub   
   >> and found problems.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Do I have to start calling you names like Jackass   
   > to get your attention?   
      
   I have forked your code and published changes; how much more attention   
   do you want?   
      
   I have endowed your x86utm with the ability to validate your   
   belief that a simulated DD or DDD does not halt.   
      
   You should have done this yourself!   
      
   You /need/ that in order to validate that your /cheats/ are working   
      
   When a top level DDD terminates, but HHH returns 0, you are   
   claiming that the simulated DDD does not terminate, right?   
      
   You have a cheat in place to ensure that: the Root variable:   
   when that is zero in a simulated HHH, it disableds the abort   
   code, ensuring runaway recursive behavior.   
      
   But when we investigate that with actual code, we find that   
   the cheat is not working; DDD does terminate, and another   
   abort detection is seen out of the simulateed HHH.   
   The simulated HHH seems ot be running with Root == 1.   
      
   I've given you the tool to validate that your own cheats are working, so   
   that when you say that the simulated DDD does not halt, you can be   
   confident that it doesn't, having actually tested it with the   
   "reckoning" module.   
      
   And here you are, asking for more attention to some incomplete   
   code fragment and Chat GPT text or whatever.   
      
   > A straight forward sequence of steps that any   
   > C programmer can easily determine:   
   >   
   > int DD()   
   > {   
   >    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);   
   >    if (Halt_Status)   
   >      HERE: goto HERE;   
   >    return Halt_Status;   
   > }   
      
   Why would I look at this, rather than your complete work   
   that can execute?   
      
   This is not even a complete program; there is no HHH definition.   
      
   --   
   TXR Programming Language: http://nongnu.org/txr   
   Cygnal: Cygwin Native Application Library: http://kylheku.com/cygnal   
   Mastodon: @Kazinator@mstdn.ca   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)