XPost: comp.theory   
   From: chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/27/2025 9:50 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:   
   > The message body is Copyright (C) 2025 Tristan Wibberley except   
   > citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except as noted in   
   > the sig.   
   >   
   > On 27/10/2025 13:18, olcott wrote:   
   >   
   > [immediately preceding content snipped from message   
   > 10dnrfo$r5i3$2@dont-email.me]   
   >   
   >> I am only looking for a fair review of the above   
   >> 15 lines.   
   >   
   > I'll call them The Olcott 15 lines of 10dnrfo$r5i3$2@dont-email.me for   
   > the moment.   
   >   
   > The purpose of The Olcott 15 lines of 10dnrfo$r5i3$2@dont-email.me is   
   > not clear enough to me for my fair review beyond noting that absence of   
   > clear purpose itself.   
   >   
   > How did I do?   
      
   The program is so simple even a child might be able to understand it. I   
   fuzzed it for fun, all paths hit. One path is that GOTO infinite loop.   
   The other one halts. So, I fuzzed HHH(DD) to where it hit both paths.   
   simple. It means that its dependent on the return value from HHH(DD). It   
   means that DD can sometimes halt, and other times hit an infinite goto   
   loop. That's about it. My fuzzer does not need a per(x86)-instruction   
   simulator or anything like that. It runs the program as is on any   
   system, just fuzzed.   
      
   [...]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)