home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   comp.lang.c      Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING      243,242 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 241,564 of 243,242   
   olcott to Kaz Kylheku   
   Re: Kaz insists on dodging this point on   
   27 Oct 25 19:29:30   
   
   XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/27/2025 7:23 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-10-27, olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 10/27/2025 3:48 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-10-27, dbush  wrote:   
   >>>>> I am only referring to these fifteen lines   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> A straight forward sequence of steps that any   
   >>>>> C programmer can easily determine:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> int D()   
   >>>>> {   
   >>>>>      int Halt_Status = H(D);   
   >>>>>      if (Halt_Status)   
   >>>>>        HERE: goto HERE;   
   >>>>>      return Halt_Status;   
   >>>>> }   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Then you have nothing as this is incomplete and cannot be run.   
   >>   
   >> This proves the general idea regardless of the   
   >> implementation details of any specific instance.   
   >   
   > OK, so you are saying you no longer have a viable, discussion-worthy   
   > instance?   
   >   
   > Oopsies, if so!   
   >   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   Sure I do, you just know that this is so dead   
   obviously correct that you keep erasing it   
      
   HHH(DD) simulates DD that calls HHH(DD) to do this   
   again and again until HHH figures out what is up.   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca