XPost: comp.theory   
   From: polcott333@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/28/2025 4:43 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   > On 2025-10-28, olcott  wrote:   
   >> On 10/28/2025 2:37 PM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>> On 2025-10-28, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>> On 10/28/2025 11:35 AM, Kaz Kylheku wrote:   
   >>>>> On 2025-10-28, olcott  wrote:   
   >>>>>> Deciders only compute a mapping from their actual   
   >>>>>> inputs. Computing the mapping from non-inputs is   
   >>>>>> outside of the scope of Turing machines.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Calculating the halting of certain inputs is indeed impossible   
   >>>>> for some halting algorithms.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not just impossible outside of the scope of every Turing machine.   
   >>>> Its the same kind of thing as requiring the purely mental object   
   >>>> of a Turing machine to bake a birthday cake.   
   >>>   
   >>> It simply isn't. Inputs that are not correctly solvable by some   
   >>> deciders are decided by some others.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> THIS INPUT IS SOLVABLE   
   >> THE NON-INPUT IS OUT-OF-SCOPE   
   >>   
   >> DO I HAVE TO REPEAT THAT 10,000   
   >> TIME BEFORE YOU NOTICE THAT I EVER SAID IT ONCE?   
   >   
   > You have not said anything substantial about this even once.   
   >   
      
   Do you understand that deciders only report on their inputs?   
      
   --   
   Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius   
   hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)