From: Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
bart writes:
> On 28/10/2025 21:59, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> bart writes:
>>> On 28/10/2025 02:35, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>>>> On 27.10.2025 16:11, bart wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> If speed wasn't an issue then we'd all be using easy dynamic languages
>>>> Huh? - Certainly not.
>>>
>>> *I* would! That's why I made my scripting languages as fast and
>>> capable as possible, so they could be used for more tasks.
>>>
>>> However, if I dare to suggest that even one other person in the world
>>> might also have the same desire, you'd say that I can't possibly know
>>> that.
>>>
>>> And yet here you are: you say 'certainly not'. Obviously *you* know
>>> everyone else's mindset!
>> I'll give this one more try.
>> This kind of thing makes it difficult to communicate with you.
>
> You're talking to the wrong guy. It's JP who's difficult to talk to.
No, I'm talking to you. It turns out that was a mistake.
My post was **only** about your apparent confusion about a single
statement, quoted above. I wasn't talking about JP personally, or about
any of his other interactions with you. I explained in great detail
what I was referring to. You ignored it.
You seem unwilling or unable to focus on one thing.
> He (I assume) always dismisses every single one of my arguments out of hand:
>
> Build speed is never a problem - ever. The speed of any language
> implemention is never a concern either.
And here you are putting words in other people's mouths.
I think you goal is to argue, not to do anything that might result in
agreement or learning.
[...]
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
