From: Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
      
   bart  writes:   
   > On 29/10/2025 01:48, Keith Thompson wrote:   
   >> bart  writes:   
   >>> On 28/10/2025 21:59, Keith Thompson wrote:   
   >>>> bart  writes:   
   >>>>> On 28/10/2025 02:35, Janis Papanagnou wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 27.10.2025 16:11, bart wrote:   
   >>>> [...]   
   >>>>>>> If speed wasn't an issue then we'd all be using easy dynamic languages   
   [...]   
      
   Bart, is the above statement literally accurate?  Do you believe that   
   we would ALL be using "easy dynamic languages" if speed were not an   
   issue, meaning that non-dynamic languages would die out completely?   
      
   That's what this whole sub-argument is about.   
      
   Maybe your statement was meant to be hyberbole, and that what you   
   really meant is that dynamic languages would be more popular than   
   they are now if speed were not an issue.  Possibly someone just took   
   your figuratative statement a little too literally.  If that's the   
   case, please just say so.   
      
   --   
   Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
   void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)