Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    comp.lang.c    |    Meh, in C you gotta define EVERYTHING    |    243,242 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 241,702 of 243,242    |
|    Keith Thompson to David Brown    |
|    Re: New and improved version of cdecl    |
|    30 Oct 25 13:37:41    |
   
   From: Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
      
   David Brown writes:   
   [...]   
   > Try "time make -j" as a simple step.   
   [...]   
      
   In my recent testing, "make -j" without a numeric argument (which   
   tells make to run as many parallel steps as possible) caused my   
   system to bog down badly. This was on a fairly large project (I used   
   vim); it might not be as much of a problem with a smaller project.   
      
   I've found that "make -j $(nproc)" is safer. The "nproc" command   
   is likely to be available on any system that has a "make" command.   
      
   It occurs to me that "make -j N" can fail if the Makefile does   
   not correctly reflect all the dependencies. I suspect this is   
   less likely to be a problem if the Makefile is generated rather   
   than hand-written.   
      
   --   
   Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com   
   void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca